Market research

Feldspar market in CIS

Feldspar market in CIS

Release date: Mar 29, 2026

Submission: 15 minutes after payment

Research period: 2017-2025

Report language:
English Русский

Submission method: to your account

File format: docx, xlsx

Single Report

$500
  • Instant access to detailed data on one specific market
  • Ideal for one-off tasks: niche assessments, presentations, investment decisions
  • Available in Excel and Word in 15 minutes after purchase
  • Cheaper than subscription, but each market requires a separate purchase
Best if you know exactly what you need

Platform Subscription

from$600
  • Complete and unlimited data access across products and regions
  • Includes continuous data updates during subscription period
  • Download reports instantly in Word, and Excel formats
  • More cost-effective for multiple markets or regular analysis
Ideal for regular data users

"CIS" region includes following countries:

Azerbaijan
Armenia
Belarus
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Moldova
Russia
Tajikistan
Uzbekistan

Earlier Report Observations

The feldspar market in CIS stood at 1 692 K t in 2018. State-owned companies played a key role in extraction and supply, ensuring stability, while investment in production capacity, especially in the Ural region, laid the groundwork for expansion. Market volume grew to 1 746 K t in 2019, supported by continued investment and the launch of new large-scale production facilities. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused temporary supply chain disruptions, contributing to a market decline to 1 667 K t. State enterprises tightened control to secure domestic demand, and new product segments focused on sustainability emerged.

The market rebounded strongly to 1 933 K t in 2021. This growth was fueled by the ongoing modernization and expansion of production capacities at major companies and rising consumer demand for environmentally friendly and certified materials. Tighter requirements for product marking and traceability also shaped the market. By 2022, the market volume saw a modest decline to 1 877 K t. New rules for labeling and packaging aimed at increasing transparency, alongside stricter controls on import and export due to shifts in international trade policy, created new market conditions. Investments in production localization to reduce import dependency continued during this period.

Table of content

  1. 1. Disclaimer
  2. 2. Terms of use of the report
  3. 3. Product codes in the statistical classifications used in the report
  4. 4. Key Market Indicators and Trends
    1. 4.1. Key Market Indicators
      1. 4.1.1. In kind
        1. 4.1.1.1. Production, 2018-2022
        2. 4.1.1.2. Imports, 2018-2024
        3. 4.1.1.3. Exports, 2018-2024
        4. 4.1.1.4. Market size, 2018-2022
    2. 4.2. Market Trends and Factors
  5. 5. Production
    1. 5.1. Production in CIS
      1. 5.1.1. Annual dynamics of production in CIS in kind, 2018-2022, K t
    2. 5.2. Global production by Country, 2018-2022
      1. 5.2.1. Annual dynamics of production by country in kind, 2018-2022, K t
      2. 5.2.2. Structure of production by countries in kind, 2018-2022
      3. 5.2.3. Dynamics of peoduction structure by countries in kind, 2018-2022
  6. 6. Imports
    1. 6.1. Imports (Direct Data*)
      1. 6.1.1. Imports - Total information
      2. 6.1.2. Imports in kind, K t
        1. 6.1.2.1. Annual dynamics of product's imports to Azerbaijan in kind, 2018-2024, K t
        2. 6.1.2.2. Dynamics of product's imports in kind to Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, K t
        3. 6.1.2.3. Structure of product's imports in kind by countries, 2018-2024
      3. 6.1.3. Imports in value, K $ US
        1. 6.1.3.1. Annual dynamics of product's imports to Azerbaijan in value, 2018-2024, K $ US
        2. 6.1.3.2. Dynamics of product's imports in value to Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, K $ US
        3. 6.1.3.3. Structure of product's imports in value by countries, 2018-2024
      4. 6.1.4. Average price of product's imports, $ US/t
        1. 6.1.4.1. Annual dynamics of average price of product's imports to Azerbaijan, 2018-2024, $ US/t
        2. 6.1.4.2. Dynamics of average price of product's imports to Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, $ US/t
    2. 6.2. Imports (Mirror Data)
      1. 6.2.1. Imports - Total information
      2. 6.2.2. Imports in kind, K t
        1. 6.2.2.1. Annual dynamics of product's imports to Azerbaijan in kind, 2018-2024, K t
        2. 6.2.2.2. Dynamics of product's imports in kind to Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, K t
        3. 6.2.2.3. Structure of product's imports in kind by countries, 2018-2024
      3. 6.2.3. Imports in value, K $ US
        1. 6.2.3.1. Annual dynamics of product's imports to Azerbaijan in value, 2018-2024, K $ US
        2. 6.2.3.2. Dynamics of product's imports in value to Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, K $ US
        3. 6.2.3.3. Structure of product's imports in value by countries, 2018-2024
      4. 6.2.4. Average price of product's imports, $ US/t
        1. 6.2.4.1. Annual dynamics of average price of product's imports to Azerbaijan, 2018-2024, $ US/t
        2. 6.2.4.2. Dynamics of average price of product's imports to Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, $ US/t
  7. 7. Exports
    1. 7.1. Exports (Direct Data*)
      1. 7.1.1. Exports - Total information
      2. 7.1.2. Exports in kind, K t
        1. 7.1.2.1. Annual dynamics of product's exports from Azerbaijan in kind, 2018-2024, K t
        2. 7.1.2.2. Dynamics of product's exports in kind from Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, K t
        3. 7.1.2.3. Structure of product's exports in kind by countries, 2018-2024
      3. 7.1.3. Exports in value, K $ US
        1. 7.1.3.1. Annual dynamics of product's exports from Azerbaijan in value, 2018-2024, K $ US
        2. 7.1.3.2. Dynamics of product's exports in value from Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, K $ US
        3. 7.1.3.3. Structure of product's exports in value by countries, 2018-2024
      4. 7.1.4. Average price of product's exports, $ US/t
        1. 7.1.4.1. Annual dynamics of average price of product's exports from Azerbaijan, 2018-2024, $ US/t
        2. 7.1.4.2. Dynamics of average price of product's exports from Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, $ US/t
    2. 7.2. Exports (Mirror Data)
      1. 7.2.1. Exports - Total information
      2. 7.2.2. Exports in kind, K t
        1. 7.2.2.1. Annual dynamics of product's exports from Azerbaijan in kind, 2018-2024, K t
        2. 7.2.2.2. Dynamics of product's exports in kind from Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, K t
        3. 7.2.2.3. Structure of product's exports in kind by countries, 2018-2024
      3. 7.2.3. Exports in value, K $ US
        1. 7.2.3.1. Annual dynamics of product's exports from Azerbaijan in value, 2018-2024, K $ US
        2. 7.2.3.2. Dynamics of product's exports in value from Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, K $ US
        3. 7.2.3.3. Structure of product's exports in value by countries, 2018-2024
      4. 7.2.4. Average price of product's exports, $ US/t
        1. 7.2.4.1. Annual dynamics of average price of product's exports from Azerbaijan, 2018-2024, $ US/t
        2. 7.2.4.2. Dynamics of average price of product's exports from Azerbaijan by countries, 2018-2024, $ US/t
  8. 8. Trade balance
    1. 8.1. Trade balance (Direct Data)
      1. 8.1.1. In kind, K t
      2. 8.1.2. In value, K $ US
    2. 8.2. Trade balance (Mirror Data)
      1. 8.2.1. In kind, K t
      2. 8.2.2. In value, K $ US
  9. 9. Top buying and selling countries, 2018-2024
    1. 9.1. Direct Data
      1. 9.1.1. Import in Value by Countries-buyers
      2. 9.1.2. Export in Value by Countries-suppliers
    2. 9.2. Mirror Data
      1. 9.2.1. Import in Value by Countries-buyers
      2. 9.2.2. Export in Value by Countries-suppliers

Production feldspar in CIS

In kind, 2017-2020, K t

Top producers of feldspar, 2017-2020

Source: SHEV.io

World map of production of feldspar, 2017-2020

Source: SHEV.io

Feldspar production in the CIS has increased for the third consecutive year. In 2020, production reached 988.2 K t, showing little change from the previous year. Between 2017 and 2020, production grew by 7.6%, which translates to an annualized growth rate of 2.5%.

Annual dynamics of production in CIS in kind, 2017-2020, K t

Parameter201820192020CAGR
1Change from last year3.5%3.9%0.1%2.5%
Source: SHEV.io

In value, 2017-2020, M $ US

Feldspar production in the CIS has risen for the third year in a row. In 2020, the output was valued at 123.1 M $ US, marking a 6.7% increase compared to the prior year. From 2017 to 2020, production increased by 14.8%, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.7%.

Annual dynamics of production in CIS in value, 2017-2020, M $ US

Parameter201820192020CAGR
1Change from last year3.1%4.3%6.7%4.7%
Source: SHEV.io

Exports feldspar from CIS

Exports in kind, K t

Cross-border shipments of feldspar from the CIS have declined for the third consecutive year. In 2020, export volume amounted to 39.0 K t, representing a steep decrease of 25.2% compared to 2019. Over the period from 2017 to 2020, exports fell by 32.7%, with a CAGR of 12.4%.

Annual dynamics of product's exports from CIS in kind, 2017-2020, K t

Parameter201820192020CAGR
1Change from last year(6.5%)(3.7%)(25.2%)(12.4%)
Source: SHEV.io

From 2017 to 2020, Ukraine was the leading destination in the structure of exports in kind, accounting for 7.8% of total flows.

Structure of product's exports in kind by countries, 2017-2020

Source: SHEV.io

World map of product's exports from CIS in kind, 2017-2020

Source: SHEV.io

Exports in value, K $ US

Feldspar export volume from the CIS has declined for the third consecutive year. In 2020, exports totaled 4 861 K $ US, down by 20.3% compared to 2019. Between 2017 and 2020, exports decreased by 28.2%, with a CAGR of 10.4%.

Annual dynamics of product's exports from CIS in value, 2017-2020, K $ US

Parameter201820192020CAGR
1Change from last year(6.8%)(3.3%)(20.3%)(10.4%)
Source: SHEV.io

From 2017 to 2020, Ukraine and Italy stood out as the main buyers of feldspar from the CIS, together forming 9.4% of total exports in value terms.

Structure of product's exports in value by countries, 2017-2020

Source: SHEV.io

World map of product's exports from CIS in value, 2017-2020

Source: SHEV.io

Imports feldspar to CIS

Imports in kind, K t

After a two-year increase, foreign feldspar supplies to the CIS declined. In 2019, imports peaked at 811.1 K t, with the largest increase of 1.9% recorded that year. In 2020, imports stood at 718.2 K t, showing a notable decline of 11.5% year-over-year. Over the period from 2017 to 2020, imports decreased by 9.4%, with a CAGR of 3.2%.

Annual dynamics of product's imports to CIS in kind, 2017-2020, K t

Parameter201820192020CAGR
1Change from last year0.4%1.9%(11.5%)(3.2%)
Source: SHEV.io

From 2017 to 2020, Ukraine and Turkey jointly absorbed 87.9% of total imports in kind of feldspar to the CIS, with the remaining volume scattered across smaller markets.

Structure of product's imports in kind by countries, 2017-2020

Source: SHEV.io

World map of product's imports to CIS in kind, 2017-2020

Source: SHEV.io

Imports in value, K $ US

After a two-year gain, imported feldspar volumes to the CIS declined. In 2019, the maximum value was recorded at 41 035 K $ US, with the largest increase of 8.1% that year. In 2020, imports tallied 32 998 K $ US, down by 19.6% over the past year. Between 2017 and 2020, imports decreased by 9.5%, equating to an annualized rate of 3.3%.

Annual dynamics of product's imports to CIS in value, 2017-2020, K $ US

Parameter201820192020CAGR
1Change from last year4.1%8.1%(19.6%)(3.3%)
Source: SHEV.io

Throughout 2017 to 2020, Ukraine (43.1% of imports in value terms), Turkey (35.3% of imports in value terms), and Finland (4.2% of imports in value terms) remained the key partners in imports in value terms, together accounting for 82.5% of total flows.

Structure of product's imports in value by countries, 2017-2020

Source: SHEV.io

World map of product's imports to CIS in value, 2017-2020

Source: SHEV.io

Why Choose Us?

Only Verified Data

We provide data exclusively verified by trusted sources and our proprietary validation algorithms.
Сompetitors offer unverified rough estimates, which can differ greatly from reality and therefore cannot be reliably used for decision-making

No Hidden Costs or Separate Fees

All critical data is included in our reports at no extra cost (e.g. top importers and exporters)
Competitors charge separately for essential sections, making their final reports significantly more expensive compared to ours

Smarter Subscription Pricing

Our subscription plans are among the best on the market, offering excellent value and flexibility
Competitors typically set significantly higher prices while offering fewer features and more limited data access

Contact Our Team

Submit your inquiry using the form below — our team will get back to you within 24 hours.

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. You can manage your preferences or learn more in our Privacy Policy.