← Back to news

India Sets Target of 60,000 Tonnes of Silk Output by 2030-31, Top Global Rank by 2028-29

India's central government has set a target of raising national silk production to 60,000 tonnes by 2030-31. It has also fixed 2028-29 as the year by which India should rank first in the world in silk output, a position long held by China. The announcement does not specify budgets, participating states or the split between mulberry and non-mulberry silk.

India Sets Target of 60,000 Tonnes of Silk Output by 2030-31, Top Global Rank by 2028-29

A 60,000-tonne target for 2030-31

India's central government has set a target of raising national silk production to 60,000 tonnes by 2030-31. The figure is framed as a country-level output goal for the sericulture sector and is tied to a fixed fiscal-year horizon rather than left open-ended.

Silk is one of the few textile raw materials in which India runs an integrated domestic chain, from cocoon rearing through reeling, twisting, weaving and finishing. A production target expressed in tonnes therefore carries consequences well beyond the farm gate: reeling capacity, yarn availability for handloom and powerloom weavers, and the volume of raw silk the country needs to buy abroad all move with it.

The 2028-29 goal of becoming the largest producer

Alongside the volume target, the government has set 2028-29 as the year by which India should rank first in the world in silk production. That is a separate and earlier milestone. It is a relative ranking rather than an absolute tonnage, and it depends as much on what other producing countries do as on India's own expansion.

Reaching the top position would require overtaking China, which has long held the leading place in global raw silk output and remains the reference point for price formation in the trade. The cost base and the geography of Chinese mulberry acreage and reeling capacity have shifted over recent years, but the Indian announcement does not quantify the gap that would have to be closed.

The two dates also imply different kinds of work. Moving to first place by 2028-29 is largely a question of how fast existing rearing and reeling capacity can be scaled and how quickly new mulberry acreage comes into bearing. Holding a 60,000-tonne run rate by 2030-31 is a question of yield, disease control and the economics of cocoon prices for farmers, who decide each season whether sericulture beats the alternative crop.

What the announcement does not specify

The published detail leaves several operational questions open for producers, processors and buyers:

  • the split between mulberry and non-mulberry silk inside the 60,000-tonne figure;
  • the budget, subsidy structure and any incentives attached to the expansion;
  • the states and agro-climatic zones expected to deliver the additional volume;
  • the baseline against which progress towards the 2030-31 target will be measured.

What it means for the textile chain

For domestic weavers and processors the relevant variable is grade, not tonnage alone. India's supply gap has historically sat in higher-grade bivoltine raw silk used for premium fabric, and that is the segment most exposed to imports. Whether the 60,000-tonne target is met with volume from existing varieties or with a shift towards finer grades will determine how far it actually displaces purchases from abroad.

For exporters of finished silk goods such as saris, scarves, made-ups and furnishing fabric, a larger and more consistent domestic supply base would reduce exposure to imported yarn prices and to currency swings on raw material purchases. For suppliers outside India, a rising Indian output curve points to slower growth in one of the world's larger import markets for raw silk, even if the composition of that demand shifts towards specialised grades.

Price is the other transmission channel. Raw silk is a thin market by the standards of cotton or polyester, and volumes added at the margin move quotations quickly. A sustained Indian expansion would put downward pressure on cocoon and raw silk prices in producing regions, squeezing farm margins at the same time as it improves input costs for weavers. That tension is what any tonnage-led target in a small commodity has to manage.

Full market analysis

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. You can manage your preferences or learn more in our Privacy Policy.